Peer Review Guidelines
Buddha Journal of Pharmaceutical science and Research (BJPSR)
The Importance of Peer-Reviewed Journals
Publishing research in a peer-reviewed journal is essential for ensuring the credibility, reliability, and academic value of scholarly work. Peer-reviewed journals are widely respected within the global research community, and publication in such outlets is recognized as a mark of scientific excellence. This not only enhances the author's reputation but also supports academic growth and professional advancement.
The peer review process strengthens the quality of research by providing constructive feedback from field experts. Reviewers help identify gaps, refine methodologies, and enhance the clarity and rigor of the manuscript, resulting in a more robust and impactful final publication. Furthermore, articles published in peer-reviewed journals generally achieve greater visibility, readership, and citation potential.
Why Choose BJPSR: A Trusted Peer-Reviewed Journal?
Buddha Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences & Research (BJPSR) is committed to maintaining stringent peer review standards to uphold the integrity, accuracy, and scientific relevance of its publications. We ensure an optimal balance between efficient processing times and thorough, unbiased evaluation.
Our Peer Review Policy
BJPSR publishes high-quality research across pharmaceutical, medical, and biological sciences. Our editorial policy emphasizes:
- Scientific rigor and methodological accuracy
- Originality and contribution to knowledge
- Ethical integrity and transparency
- Freedom of academic expression and constructive scholarly debate
Manuscripts submitted to BJPSR are evaluated solely on their academic merit, relevance to the journal's scope, and adherence to ethical standards—irrespective of the authors' background, institutional affiliation, nationality, or discipline.
Review Process
All submissions undergo a structured review process, which includes:
1. Initial Editorial Screening
Assessment of scope, basic quality, and ethical compliance.
2. Peer Review by Subject Experts
Anonymous reviewers evaluate originality, methodology, scientific validity, clarity, and relevance.
3. Revision Process
Authors may be asked to revise the manuscript based on reviewers' feedback.
4. Final Editorial Decision
Approval or rejection based on review outcomes and the journal's publishing standards.
Interested in Becoming a Reviewer?
Join our panel of expert reviewers and contribute to academic excellence.
Apply as Reviewer